Win M8S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWin M8S  (all builds)
MotherboardWin
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 13:22
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 155
52% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 280
25% 214 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0301 02F3) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.2
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK900-512GB 512GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103N0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 962
Write 604
Mixed 591
159% 719 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 11.6
78% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 116
144% 271 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 185%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
51GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.7
Write 12.2
Mixed 6
23% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
56% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x3GB
4 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 321
12% 321 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 20 75 24" 1280 720 ONN0000 100025358
Typical M8S Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Win M8S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback