PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP35C-DS3R (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090618 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 15 '24 at 07:32 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
QXSSD-512GB 512GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1027A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 158 161 164 162 165 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
3 1TB SSD 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 159 156 163 164 163 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
95GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 77 78 79 79 MB/s
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
Usb3.0 Super Speed 4TB
404GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 124 125 128 128 128 MB/s
|
||||
HitachiG ST 2TB
332GB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
8.46%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 64 | 46 | 60 | 26.9" | 1280 720 | PDX2800 VM280UHD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 11x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |