Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME H310M-K
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '24 at 21:50
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 581 66% 517 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.4% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 45.4 Parallax 36 28% 38.8 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 35.7 Splatting 25.1 25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 196 59 19 21 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 446 Write 387 Mixed 383 SusWrite 87.7 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.4 41% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 100%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 13,327 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 162 162 163 163 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 2x8GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 21.6 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	34	12	165	23.5"	1280 720	ACR0946 XZ240Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	237x
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	159x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	153x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	373x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	97x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	76x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	97x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	93x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	81x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	112x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 51,435 samples	97x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $641

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16