HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	234% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 89EB
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '24 at 21:43
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 69.7 1-Core 159 2-Core 311 95% 180 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 909 91% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% HP(103C 8B49) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	234% Outstanding	Lighting 338 Reflection 453 Parallax 336 276% 376 fps	MRender 468 Gravity 293 Splatting 211 252% 324 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 256%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,343 Write 1,587 Mixed 1,623 341% 1,518 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 42.9 147% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 984 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 680 490% 651 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 413%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8MR-8X 2x8GB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.5% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 25 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 24.5 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	144	29.5"	1280 720	MSI3CC5 MSI MAG301RF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-0xxx Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 199%

UFO

Desktop 108%

UFO

Workstation 215%

UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-12700FIntel $250Bench 109%, 19,845 samples	98x
Core i5-12400FIntel $133Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	43x
Core i5-12400Intel $158Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	24x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	92x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	68x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	28x

SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBNvmeBench 205%, 2,140 samples	147x
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-1T00-1106 1TBNvmeBench 379%, 676 samples	17x
PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GBWDBench 236%, 1,141 samples	13x

RAM
HP37D4U1S8MR-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 95%, 903 samples	144x
HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 2,284 samples	11x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 4x16GBKingstonBench 95%, 3,818 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16