HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231003
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 263
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 705
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 21.5
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 17
Splatting 17.1
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,800
Write 2,150
Mixed 1,885
436% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 52.6
169% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 812
581% 763 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC156 PHL 273V7
Typical Laptop 15s-eq2xxx Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback