Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory34.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 17:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 61.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 255
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 846
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,295
80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3623
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.9% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 64.9
56% 74.3 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 69
64% 80.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.5 5.3 4.9 3.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 485
Write 424
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.6
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 100%
Acer SA100 1920GB
321GB free
Firmware: V1021A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 432 428 430 188 3.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 454
Write 431
Mixed 377
SusWrite 320
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 21.6
124% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 30.7
85% 175 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 17.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 3R 8G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 41% 37 215 58 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback