Asus H110M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-R (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '24 at 16:20
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$62 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 162 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 251 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 850C) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 8.6 Parallax 9.1 7% 8.6 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 6.9 6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV5001920G 2TB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 422 223 229 183 159 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 431 Write 444 Mixed 339 SusWrite 260 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 35.8 122% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 164 146% 219 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 98%
Hitachi HUH728060ALE600 6TB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5.5TB free Firmware: A4GNT7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 180 180 193 197 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 172 Mixed 77 SusWrite 190 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 2x16GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 23 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 19.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	43	30	36.1"	1280 720	VES3700 50UHD_LCD_TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	930x
Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	378x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	529x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	341x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	306x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	144x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	121x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	114x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16