Alienware m18 R1 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware m18 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0HR91K
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 200
2-Core 393
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 758
8-Core 1,464
132% 1,111 Pts
64-Core 2,522
156% 2,522 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Dell(1028 0C4A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 13.9
6% 12.1 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.4
13% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 1423 1407 1425 1405 1976 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 3672
Mixed 2,497
SusWrite 1628
579% 2,560 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 67.1
212% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,582
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 1,381
1,027% 1,369 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 324%
Great: 451%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78MEBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 42.9
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 43.9
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 44.3
132% 46.2 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 128%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 480 18" 1280 720 CMN18A0
Typical m18 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 174% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback