Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE Graphics 1,241 User benchmarks, average bench 81% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 38.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 222 65% 127 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 618 62% 502 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% AMD(1002 1636) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	8.61% Terrible	Lighting 9.8 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 19.8 8% 13.9 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 15 Splatting 16.4 10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.61% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30021 500GB 1,027 User benchmarks, average bench 195% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: STPSC014 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 182 Write 1,142 Mixed 364 129% 563 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 31.9 110% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 831 DQ Write 665 DQ Mixed 478 431% 658 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 276%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 110 110 112 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 141 Write 119 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 110 123% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 1x8GB 435 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 7.4 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	8%	12	69	51	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16