Lenovo IdeaCentre K330

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo IdeaCentre K330 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '24 at 20:39
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 82.7 46% 68.7 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 205 22% 172 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CSSD-S6B480CG3VX 480GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 126 208 116 114 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 458 Write 406 Mixed 329 SusWrite 148 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 28.7 100% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 209 157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 97%
CSSD-S6B480CG3VX 480GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 200GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 396 354 104 108 107 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 199 Write 104 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 249 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 10.2 46% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 4x8GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	21	0	60	20.1"	1280 720	EHJ4C81 LD22W81S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical IdeaCentre K330 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo IdeaCentre K330

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	60x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	22x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 39%, 485 samples	6x
CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,052 samples	4x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16