Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '24 at 13:13
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 169 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 274 35% 264 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.1% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 37 Parallax 35.4 28% 35.5 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 35.6 Splatting 25 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geil Zenith A3 120GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 144 145 143 145 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 454 Write 143 Mixed 199 SusWrite 142 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 28.7 105% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 153 127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 323GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 24 26 22 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB 5,295 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 317GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 53.2 Write 30.8 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 37 29% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 2x4GB 1,090 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	31	60	40"	1920 1080	SAM0C39 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16