Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 214%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 12:51
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$159
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 65.3
1-Core 182
2-Core 356
103% 201 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1125
111% 905 Pts
64-Core 1,568
97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$595
Gigabyte(1458 413B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
224% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 316
Parallax 339
259% 324 fps
MRender 464
Gravity 269
Splatting 214
246% 316 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 224%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 118 96 108 149 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 426
Write 363
Mixed 350
SusWrite 136
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 28.5
105% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 162
126% 168 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
33GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 237 34 40 39 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 402
Write 394
Mixed 348
SusWrite 122
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 335
252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 121%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
389GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1418 1964 1687 67 317 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 2,024
Mixed 1,671
SusWrite 920
348% 1544 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 76.1
282% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,776
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1,465
1,094% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 270%
Great: 394%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 147 143 146 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 151
Write 181
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 144
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 156 152 155 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 57.2
Write 104
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 153
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 14.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 23.5" 1280 720 ACR062A ED242QR A
Typical GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback