Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 VA70_HC
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 19 '16 at 19:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 157
58% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 206
38% 263 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.69
3% 3.94 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 258
Write 239
Mixed 253
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 13.9
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 55.7
60% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
344GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 65.7
Mixed 79.4
54% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.19
69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback