MSI PRO Z690-A (MS-7D25)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive477% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A (MS-7D25)  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 02:17
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$221
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 200
2-Core 404
119% 229 Pts
4-Core 802
8-Core 1,384
132% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 2,353
146% 2,353 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 90.1
82% 96.5 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 77
71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4019 4072 4118 4164 4161 2297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 4,173
Mixed 3,394
SusWrite 3,805
767% 3,361 MB/s
4K Read 94.4
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 114
375% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,397
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 1,206
844% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 477%
Great: 582%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
631GB free
Firmware: 5B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3001 3008 3008 2805 1541 1550 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 2,866
Write 3,044
Mixed 2,874
SusWrite 2,486
636% 2,817 MB/s
4K Read 75.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 82.7
282% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,543
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 1,327
938% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 405%
Great: 421%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
734GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 479 479 480 481 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 477
Mixed 437
SusWrite 480
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 44.6
147% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 338
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 259 258 258 259 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 236 234 234 235 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate One Touch Hub 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0066
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 158 154 160 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 121
Write 144
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 157
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.7
345% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 135 133 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 105
Write 130
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 138
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
252% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600U3636C162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 75.4
MC Write 71.7
MC Mixed 66.7
204% 71.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 32.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 181%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical PRO Z690-A (MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 3,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A (MS-7D25)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback