Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '24 at 20:00
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User BHS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,226
115% 954 Pts
64-Core 1,555
96% 1,555 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 180
Parallax 310
123% 213 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 181
Splatting 213
174% 212 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 132%
Great: 138%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3226 3233 2387 1993 1988 2101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 2,147
Mixed 1630
SusWrite 2488
456% 2,013 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 63.8
189% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 395
368% 597 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 314%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
419GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 469 461 467 468 469 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 471
Mixed 453
SusWrite 467
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 45.6
149% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 366
253% 319 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
721GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 469 460 466 467 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 469
Mixed 435
SusWrite 466
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 43.5
128% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 316
224% 290 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 33.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0FF1 SAMSUNG
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback