Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15 BSF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15 BSF  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 194
2-Core 392
111% 218 Pts
4-Core 734
8-Core 1,219
119% 976 Pts
64-Core 1,876
116% 1,876 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 1550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 187
Parallax 207
163% 198 fps
MRender 275
Gravity 146
Splatting 118
139% 179 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 144%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme GIGABYTE AG470S1TB-SI B10 1TB
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,849
Write 3,592
Mixed 2,602
676% 3,014 MB/s
4K Read 79.6
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 122
418% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1643
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,049% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc SD5-4800 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 62.7
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 56.4
172% 60.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 23.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 152%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 16 165 15.5" 1463 823 SHP1574 LQ156T1JW05
Typical GA-AORUS 15 BSF Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15 BSF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback