Acer Swift SF315-52G

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 26 days ago.

System	Acer Swift SF315-52G (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Erdinger_KL
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '24 at 09:05
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 133 47% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 387 38% 309 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1273) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 7.1 6% 5.77 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 10.6 7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 168 69 51 49 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 320 Write 255 Mixed 193 SusWrite 98 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 13.5 54% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 172 149% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 7.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	175	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Swift SF315-52G Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF315-52G

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	118x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	28x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	115x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	31x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	27x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	22x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	16x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	22x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	19x
ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 1,016 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16