Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 20:35
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14400F-$199
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 192
2-Core 370
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,168
112% 922 Pts
64-Core 1661
103% 1661 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 34.8
22% 30.8 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 29.7
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA LEGEND 710 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2SAD01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 1182 1186 784 8.6 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 720
295% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 82.9
286% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 563
551% 873 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 259%
Great: 236%
Nvme ADATA LEGEND 800 1TB
752GB free
Firmware: V1122B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1585 1568 1557 1562 1582 1548 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,000
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,327
SusWrite 1,567
363% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 40.8
227% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 590
533% 800 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 283%
Great: 314%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
795GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 195 198 198 197 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 198
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 198
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
343GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 62.1
Write 60.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 60.3
70% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 49.5
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 25.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 138%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 22" 1280 720 GSM5678 W2242
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback