Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Laptop Refurb 15g-br016TXIN (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 832B
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '24 at 15:45
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 132 59% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 7.7 18% 99.1 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron 1300 SATA 512GB 598 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: 13000030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 240 250 299 278 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 323 Write 114 Mixed 169 SusWrite 263 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 23 74% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 290 197% 239 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 111%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 695GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 55 49 59 55 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 53.4 Write 49.9 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 58.3 34% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 1x8GB 5,210 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	13	9	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16