Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 08:48
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 727
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 138
Parallax 120
104% 128 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 118
Splatting 107
92% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 44 49 47 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
74GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 253 82 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 457
Mixed 393
SusWrite 155
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 47.2
159% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
835GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 166 164 166 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 152
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 163
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 106%
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB
144GB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 22.6
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 40.6
50% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
724GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 103 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 89.5
Write 92.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 102
103% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 8% 75 217 59 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $623
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback