User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9A PRO MAX
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 23:57
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 622
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 114
Parallax 160
138% 148 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
119% 152 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1907 1929 1930 1941 1940 1940 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,053
Write 1943
Mixed 1919
SusWrite 1,931
442% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 54.1
184% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 616
456% 609 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 284%
Great: 685%
AS-480 480GB
43GB free
Firmware: HPS1A30C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 344 342 61 68 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 451
Write 342
Mixed 272
SusWrite 206
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 10.1
89% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 14.8
65% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 36.9
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0587 SyncMaster
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback