Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 461%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 595%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics372% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B760 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D98)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime23.2 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 19:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 238
2-Core 478
136% 266 Pts
4-Core 948
8-Core 1,776
162% 1,362 Pts
64-Core 3,988
247% 3,988 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
372% Outstanding
Lighting 592
Reflection 561
Parallax 688
482% 614 fps
MRender 512
Gravity 554
Splatting 290
354% 452 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 372%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1981 2356 2371 2400 2396 2389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 1,866
Write 2356
Mixed 2,121
SusWrite 2,316
491% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 93.7
326% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,701
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,324
1,014% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 380%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
172% Outstanding
MC Read 71.2
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 63.7
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 29.6
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 172%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3204 Gigabyte M32U
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback