Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230417
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 19:33
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 91.4
42% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 348
32% 268 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Apple(106B 018F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1004 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Lighting 14
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 10.8
11% 12.4 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 13.2
7% 7.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1290
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 769
Write 988
Mixed 621
178% 793 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 21.7
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 265
224% 330 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5ANAG8NAMR-UHC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 110 23 60 15.4" 1280 720 APPA040 Color LCD
Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback