Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-54 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Octavia_CFS
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '24 at 18:19
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 120 2-Core 226 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 472 51% 403 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 6.5 5% 6.87 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.8 7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB 13,793 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 207 218 205 195 202 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 847 Write 804 Mixed 760 SusWrite 241 148% 663 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 36.8 112% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 475 DQ Mixed 480 385% 547 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 136%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 574GB free Firmware: JU001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 122 123 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 137 Write 122 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 123 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 2x8GB 536 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 21.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	5,707x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	2,873x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	2,674x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5,995x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,469x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	936x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,216x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,032x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	744x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	847x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	756x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	731x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16