Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 208 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 476 49% 397 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1064) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,489 Write 567 Mixed 935 219% 997 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 53.7 171% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 667 DQ Write 426 DQ Mixed 554 411% 549 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 202GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 50 62 54 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 56.2 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 53.4 38% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 20.7 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO5799

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 29%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	475x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	246x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	229x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	94x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	69x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	63x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16