Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT Business PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 MT Business PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 429
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 460
XFX(1682 9460) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 31.8
19% 27.2 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 27
Splatting 26.1
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 315 298 276 252 239 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 318
Mixed 277
SusWrite 282
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 40
157% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 243
204% 297 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
85GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 117 114 112 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 29
SusWrite 113
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 103%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 182 184 179 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 28 9 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN3391 HP P223
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Business PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT Business PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback