Alienware x16 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive510% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware x16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 61.8
1-Core 193
2-Core 392
109% 216 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,244
116% 964 Pts
64-Core 2,094
130% 2,094 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BF0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4525 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 348
Parallax 264
133% 258 fps
MRender 415
Gravity 239
Splatting 184
217% 279 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 149%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$147
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4347 4049 3909 3708 3697 3768 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
510% Outstanding
Read 3,533
Write 3,759
Mixed 2,862
SusWrite 3,913
794% 3,517 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 78.7
288% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 948
707% 936 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 510%
Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
155% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 66.3
MC Mixed 59.2
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 26.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 155%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0AF9
Typical x16 R1 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Alienware x16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback