Asrock J3355M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock J3355M (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '24 at 12:32
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Memory 6.04 1-Core 25.1 2-Core 28.1 11% 19.7 Pts	4-Core 29.4 8-Core 48 5% 38.7 Pts	64-Core 30.2 2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.9 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN14191 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 172 77 138 110 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 10 Write 175 Mixed 171 SusWrite 108 27% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 64.6 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 6.2 18% 39.2 MB/s	4K Write 15.3 24% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 140 68 124 104 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 119 Write 137 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 95.6 70% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Cors CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.12% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.4 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 411 10% 411 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	29	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM7016 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J3355M Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3355M

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	19x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce RTX 3060NvidiaBench 96%, 8,299 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
Se HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung 6GBHynixBench 19%, 3 samples	3x
DDR3 1866 0420 8GBA-DABench 19%, 4 samples	2x
AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 0793 12GBA-DABench 17%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16