Asrock B460M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B460M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200831
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 06:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 666
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 114 172 88 172 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 840
Mixed 792
SusWrite 147
158% 711 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 29.8
212% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 98.7
186% 352 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 134%
Great: 93%
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
85GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 169 160 132 145 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 485
Write 368
Mixed 370
SusWrite 166
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 30.2
140% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 42.4
92% 186 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 25.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 144 0" 1280 720
Typical B460M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B460M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback