HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 02:06
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 182
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 440
47% 373 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.6
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 424
Mixed 382
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 36.4
118% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 159
159% 259 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
280GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,643
Write 13.5
Mixed 26.7
820% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 382
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.1
1,523% 128 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 128 98 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40B1
Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback