Acer Aspire A715-72G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A715-72G  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Charmeleon_CFS
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 22:02
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 127
57% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 365
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 125E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 72 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 442
Write 76
Mixed 117
SusWrite 72.3
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 19
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 106
84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 10 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15B7
Typical Aspire A715-72G Builds (Compare 716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-72G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback