Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '24 at 21:11
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 32.5 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 86.1 35% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 252 24% 197 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.13% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.6 2% 3 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.13% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB 7,536 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 137 97 136 123 125 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21% Poor	Read 203 Write 161 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 123 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 6.8 16% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 131%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 507GB free Firmware: M3CR032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 364 349 349 344 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 342 Write 280 Mixed 288 SusWrite 347 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 18.2 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 176 138% 189 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2667, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 9.8 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	53	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,851x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	988x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,372x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	953x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	513x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,166x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	409x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	381x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	594x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16