Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion MS-7848 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141106
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '24 at 14:38
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 152 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 337 39% 304 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 875B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45% Average	Lighting 25 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 125 20% 74.9 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 109 Splatting 90 93% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 327 Write 258 Mixed 268 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 26.2 86% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 147 136% 208 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 0031 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6.5 14 14 15 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 108 Write 38.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 11.9 40% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	34	12	60	23.1"	1280 720	GSM5872 E2351

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	188x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	176x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	99x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	105x
M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,156 samples	52x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 53%, 1,438 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16