Lenovo 21D9S10Q00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 month ago, 2 month ago.
SystemLenovo 21D9S10Q00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21D9S10Q00
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 14:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 192
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 444
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22F7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 13.7
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 15.4
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ 1TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5Q0630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 883 965 1166 1313 1253 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,968
Write 1,112
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 1,057
290% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.6
246% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 486
359% 488 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 241%
Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC48BA1 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1536 801 LEN40BA
Typical 21D9S10Q00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 21D9S10Q00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback