MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 09:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 154
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 320
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.3
4% 6.23 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 224 218 217 204 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 979
Write 273
Mixed 495
SusWrite 214
108% 490 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 39.8
128% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 315
244% 339 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 206%
Corsair MP600 GS 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1586 1645 2012 1274 1267 2028 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 1,316
Mixed 1,870
SusWrite 1,635
364% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 53.5
174% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 454
327% 429 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 238%
Great: 437%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0ED
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback