MSI MAG B560M MORTAR (MS-7D17)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D17
MotherboardMSI MAG B560M MORTAR (MS-7D17)  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220930
Uptime22.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 06:29
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 246
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 812
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 83%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 166
Reflection 169
Parallax 186
135% 174 fps
Gravity 146
Splatting 122
117% 134 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 276 270 308 276 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,340
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 365
275% 1,220 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 72.6
252% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,223
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 1,070
806% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 202%
Great: 295%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
226GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1527 1297 1164 1056 1013 963 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,271
Write 1,947
Mixed 1,645
SusWrite 1,170
394% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 60
196% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 1,150
863% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 275%
Great: 435%
Netac Mobiledatastar 250GB
39GB free
Firmware: 1101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 49 33 23 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 379
Write 356
Mixed 326
SusWrite 51.1
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 18
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 97
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 45.4
47% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
316GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 188
Write 177
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 104
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F7F ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical MAG B560M MORTAR (MS-7D17) Builds (Compare 1,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560M MORTAR (MS-7D17)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback