Asus PRIME Z690-P D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P D4  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231211
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 05:16
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$174
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 193
2-Core 375
111% 214 Pts
4-Core 703
8-Core 1,238
117% 970 Pts
64-Core 1,806
112% 1,806 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3990) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 240
3% 84.3 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 156
Splatting 24.9
51% 65.4 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1706 1125 914 918 920 918 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 1,643
Mixed 1,822
SusWrite 1,084
395% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 48.2
157% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 150
209% 417 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 241%
Great: 442%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
390GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 239 238 245 247 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 348
Write 357
Mixed 246
SusWrite 241
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 30.5
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 126
125% 207 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 129%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
1.5TB free
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1445 1425 1611 1780 1692 1500 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 3,519
Write 1,742
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,576
467% 2,107 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 26.3
78% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,494
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 136
260% 563 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 296%
Great: 685%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
567GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 66 65 65 65 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
615GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 95 97 95 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 59.8
Write 144
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 95.4
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
516GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 184 187 185 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 55.4
Write 129
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 186
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 ASRACA1 PG27Q15R2A
Typical PRIME Z690-P D4 Builds (Compare 9,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P D4 - $306

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback