Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 01:31
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 220
2-Core 443
129% 250 Pts
4-Core 886
8-Core 1,752
156% 1,319 Pts
64-Core 3,187
197% 3,187 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.8% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 90
84% 92.3 fps
MRender 84.6
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 64.7
59% 73.7 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,218
Write 2,735
Mixed 2,071
456% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 352
4K Mixed 97.9
404% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 2046
DQ Write 1,593
DQ Mixed 1,841
1,371% 1,827 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 333%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 197
Write 175
Mixed 88.2
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
608% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3000C15D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 28.6
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2768 ASUS PA279CV
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback