TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 21:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 343
102% 196 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,207
114% 942 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 95.6
58% 77.2 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 48.8
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 55.5%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 329 454 451 451 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 461
Mixed 404
SusWrite 409
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 37.4
130% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 220
203% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 43 32 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 14.7
Write 19.6
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 24.1
13% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 11.1%
 Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 24 25 32 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 28.9
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 30.5
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 16.6%
 Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZKW 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 24.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 63.7%
 Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 75 27" 1280 720 DEL4200 DELL S2721NX
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples478x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples157x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples103x
GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples210x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples151x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples141x
SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples171x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples79x
TM8FPD001T 1TBTeamBench 226%, 4,101 samples63x
RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples350x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples41x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples37x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback