Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Memory 15.7 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 52.8 22% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 70.9 13% 88.2 Pts	64-Core 54.2 3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX130 14,117 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Legend(17AA 3FBA) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 4.8 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GB 8,016 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 352GB free (System drive) Firmware: C02C SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 588 236 43 116 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 638 Write 400 Mixed 579 SusWrite 266 105% 471 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 25.4 88% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 66.9 DQ Write 62.2 DQ Mixed 109 70% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GB 7,475 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.5 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
37%	28%	61	64	18	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	618x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	123x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	61x

SSD
TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GBKbg40znt256gBench 164%, 3,446 samples	58x
SKHynix_HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B 512GBBench 169%, 11,687 samples	46x
RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GBUmisBench 158%, 5,615 samples	39x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	85x
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 55%, 3,313 samples	82x
HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 1,381 samples	39x