MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 303%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 305%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics292% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 21:28
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$309
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 323
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,224
110% 927 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
292% Outstanding
Lighting 404
Reflection 506
Parallax 774
329% 561 fps
MRender 506
Gravity 569
Splatting 303
360% 459 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 292%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 659 656 659 643 639 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,320
Write 2,083
Mixed 1599
SusWrite 698
374% 1,675 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72
234% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1,122
842% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 259%
Great: 296%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
249GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 482 428 399 394 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 479
Mixed 420
SusWrite 428
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 51.4
170% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 268
229% 336 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
Kioxia-exceria PLUS G2 SSD 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: ECFA11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 1861 912 920 772 621 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,559
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 1,148
340% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 54
187% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,269
944% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 245%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 45.9
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 34.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 45
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5BB4 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback