Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 17:24
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 165
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 288
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 83.9
75% 89.3 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 73.2
68% 84.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0411A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 388
Mixed 368
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 17.9
89% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.9
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 32
72% 140 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 132
Mixed 76.4
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 22% 40 188 10 60 72.3" 1920 1017 EAD9000 LCD TV
Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback