MSI MPG Z590 GAMING FORCE (MS-7D06)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D06
MotherboardMSI MPG Z590 GAMING FORCE (MS-7D06)  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 17:21
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 749
68% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,581
98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 222
Parallax 219
206% 231 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 163
Splatting 132
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 168%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,860
Write 2,316
Mixed 1,968
460% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64
214% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 953
720% 974 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
ASolid USB 32GB
19GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 17.7
25% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 26.6
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 26.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 215 57 60 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MAG274QRF-QD
Typical MPG Z590 GAMING FORCE (MS-7D06) Builds (Compare 2,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z590 GAMING FORCE (MS-7D06)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback