Dell Latitude 5530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude 5530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C6CYC
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 17:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 146
51% 92 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 344
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B06) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.82% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 13.4
8% 12 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 10.7
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.82%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D512-Q11 SSSTC 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 24201114 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 764 873 816 610 605 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 1,138
Mixed 892
SusWrite 694
213% 945 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 44.2
151% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 324
227% 291 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 144%
Great: 375%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.4
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0923
Typical Latitude 5530 Builds (Compare 774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback