| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20190308 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 07 '24 at 10:51 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
82% 147 Pts
|
71% 563 Pts
|
41% 657 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.6%
Poor
|
20% 26.3 fps
|
21% 26.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HP S750 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 424 423 425 426 425 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
97% 430 MB/s
|
142% 49 MB/s
|
212% 273 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
772GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 177 175 175 176 MB/s
|
99.6%
Outstanding
|
102% 139 MB/s
|
141% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 173 173 176 176 174 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
108% 147 MB/s
|
211% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
75%
Very good
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
65% 22.8 GB/s
|
54% 73.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 66 | 56 | 60 | 32" | 1280 720 | SHP3884 Sharp TV |
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,728 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,078x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 934x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 279x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 356x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 298x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 232x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $258 |