Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics381% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 09:46
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 217
2-Core 445
127% 248 Pts
4-Core 888
8-Core 1,742
156% 1,315 Pts
64-Core 3,203
198% 3,203 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 124%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,200
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
381% Outstanding
Lighting 602
Reflection 592
Parallax 788
491% 661 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 584
Splatting 304
372% 476 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 381%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620281WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,860
Write 4,957
Mixed 3,552
994% 4,457 MB/s
4K Read 88
4K Write 303
4K Mixed 114
440% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 2,314
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 1,955
1,328% 1,665 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4W.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 44.4
132% 46 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 30.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM749C Odyssey G93SC
Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 9,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback