Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 month ago, 2 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 08:15
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$337
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 214
2-Core 422
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1,440
134% 1,117 Pts
64-Core 2,801
173% 2,801 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,454
Write 2257
Mixed 1,552
464% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 71.2
240% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1,497
DQ Mixed 1,161
904% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
XPG GAMMIX S7 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1431 1433 1428 1440 1441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,705
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,378
SusWrite 1430
384% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 62.5
209% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,503
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 1,466
1,025% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 314%
Great: 331%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZAZ-00Z 4TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 321 321 324 319 314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 308
Write 257
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 317
178% 244 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.2
394% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 180%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-7600 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 67
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 65
188% 65.9 GB/s
SC Read 53.8
SC Write 80.6
SC Mixed 57.1
182% 63.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 183%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback