ECT 9 OTTO ONE Gaming PC 132049

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemECT 9 OTTO ONE Gaming PC 132049  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 03:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 630
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
MSI(1462 328D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2012 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 68.4
61% 73.1 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 69.2
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 186 113 125 120 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 468
Write 293
Mixed 252
SusWrite 152
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 27.6
106% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 227
196% 289 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
658GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 138 139 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 99.9
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 138
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 28.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 3R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 16% 50 216 58 60 26" 1280 720 AAA0000 HDTV
Typical 9 OTTO ONE Gaming PC 132049 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: ECT 9 OTTO ONE Gaming PC 132049

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback