Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory118.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 23:17
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 224
2-Core 424
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 864
8-Core 1,723
153% 1,294 Pts
64-Core 3,805
236% 3,805 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3881) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 146
Parallax 142
119% 145 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 156
Splatting 116
131% 168 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 119%
Great: 202%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
81% 105 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 101
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,594
Write 1,782
Mixed 1,608
441% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 82.8
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 1,950
DQ Mixed 1,158
971% 1,372 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
21GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1613
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,629
351% 1,571 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 82.4
277% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,125
DQ Write 1,781
DQ Mixed 2,028
1,499% 1,978 MB/s
Poor: 221% Great: 431%
WDC WD6003FFBX-68MU3N0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 219 214 211 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 174
Write 179
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 213
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.5
10% 4.53 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 4.1
3% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23%
Great: 29%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1936 1938 1940 1936 1568 1512 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,829
SusWrite 1,805
458% 2,040 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 85.5
287% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 2,137
DQ Write 1973
DQ Mixed 2,040
1,535% 2,050 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 393%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6400C32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 47.7
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 46.9
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 48.1
142% 49.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 140%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback