HP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8458
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 13:36
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 742
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 8458) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.95
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 18
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.5
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X084N 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41010C22
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,505
Write 1,772
Mixed 1,390
418% 1,889 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 71.3
230% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 831
618% 825 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 317%
General UDisk 16GB
11GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 7.7
7% 6.87 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 4 60 0" 1280 720 27MP35
Typical Z2 Mini G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback